CE Logo  
  Home      About Us     Channels Dropdown     Columnists Dropdown     Forums Dropdown     Blogs Dropdown     Catholic Mall     Donate to CE     Help  

Sponsor



Newsletter

Sign up to receive free CE newsletters and information!

Email Address

Digest
Words of Encouragement
Homily of the Day
The Edge
Terry Mattingly email article Email this article
discuss article Discuss this article
Other Articles by Terry Mattingly
Printer Friendly Version
 
Dueling Anglican Pulpits

April 8, 2008

 There is nothing new about Anglicans worrying about the environment.

One of the Church of England's most famous hymns, after all, offers this somber vision of industrialization from poet William Blake: "And did the countenance divine shine forth upon our clouded hills? And was Jerusalem builded here among those dark satanic mills?"

Nevertheless, a recent sermon by the U.S. Episcopal Church's outspoken leader raised eyebrows as it circulated in cyberspace. Some traditionalists were not amused by a bookish discussion of bovine flatulence on the holiest day in the Christian year.

In her Easter message, Presiding Bishop Katherine Jefferts Schori stressed that all Christians should let their faith shape their actions in real life and, thus, affect the world around them.

"How can you be the sacrament, the outward and visible sign, of the grace that you know in the resurrected Christ? How can your living let others live more abundantly?" she asked, before turning to environmental concerns.

"We are beginning to be aware of the ways in which our lack of concern for the rest of creation results in death and destruction for our neighbors,"

added Jefferts Schori, who has a doctorate in oceanography. "We cannot love our neighbors unless we care for the creation that supports all our earthly lives. ...

"When atmospheric warming, due in part to the methane output of the millions of cows we raise each year to produce hamburger, begins to slowly drown the island homes of our neighbors in the South Pacific, are we truly sharing good news?"

This short sermon seemed to focus more on affirming the doctrines of Al Gore than on proclaiming the reality of the Resurrection, said Father Kendall Harmon, canon theologian of the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina and editor of The Anglican Digest. This is regrettable, since it's crucial for the modern church to do more to help protect the environment. This concern is, in fact, linked to Easter and to the ultimate hope for the renewing of God's creation, he said.

"The problem isn't so much what the presiding bishop said in this sermon, but what she all but left out of it," said Harmon. "The emphasis is totally on this one ethical dimension of our faith. ... That's important, but she didn't really connect it to what is the most important reality of all for Christians, which is that Jesus truly is risen from the dead and that really happened in time and in history and that changes everything — literally everything."

On the other side of the Anglican aisle, the Easter message offered by the leader of a controversial missionary movement also addressed social issues, but did so after a strong affirmation of a literal resurrection.

Then, Bishop Martyn Minns linked the doctrine of the empty tomb to the church's belief that miracles continue today.

"I have seen it. I have seen men and women who were dead to the things of God come alive — I have seen blind people be given their sight and I have seen sick people made well," said Minns, who leads the Convocation of Anglicans in North America. This is a network of conservative churches that have fled the Episcopal Church and are now linked to the Anglican Church of Nigeria.

"I have known people who were locked into patterns of abuse and addiction set free. ... I have witnessed broken marriages made whole and children who were lost brought back home."

It's crucial to note that these very different bishops begin with references to the Resurrection — expressed in different ways — and then build on that doctrine to talk about issues in modern life, noted Phyllis Tickle, an Episcopalian best known for writing "God Talk in America" and other books on spirituality and culture.

The bishops do have different reference points, she said.

Jefferts Schori seems to be "starting inside the church" and then saying, "Look out there. Look at the world and see what we need to go and do."

Meanwhile, Minns is "starting inside the church" and then saying, "Come in here. This is what happens when the church is really alive."

The sad reality in Anglicanism today, she said, "Is that both of these leaders are talking to their people, to the people that they lead, but they are no longer part of the same body."


Anglicanism is not the only denomination that has been infected by the modernist idea of environmental evangelization. I have many Catholic brothers and sisters who seem to have given up on bringing God's love to the people around them and are now concentrating on bringing God's love to our planet instead.

Mattingly has it right that these environmental evangelists seem to be focused on affirming the doctrines of Al Gore instead of the love of God for His people.

I have nothing against the environmental movement, and believe that the care of all creation is the responsibility of man who was given dominion over them. But, when fellow Catholics start borrowing snippets of Scripture to turn this concern for creation into the new mission of Christ's Church, I have to wonder why the mission that Christ gave them isn't good enough.

When Christ commanded us to "love one another", He wasn't talking about the rocks and trees.


These churches have compromised the gospel so much that they no longer even have a clear understanding of Christs mission.  Jesus came to us to bring salvation and open the way to heaven.  He did not come to bring peace or to solve our worldly problems.  He in fact advised his followers that they could expect persecution and other difficulties should they decide to follow him.  These modern, mainstream churches think the gospel message is all about the here and now, because I suspect deep down they don't really even believe in the divine.


I do have a huge issue with Environmentalism. My problem is not with the everyday enviro who just wants to have a pleasant environment. But the movement has a philosophy and a set of goals that would appall the average neighborhood tree hugger. The philosophy is simple: humans are a cancer on this planet and the planet will not be "healed" until we rid ourselves of 5/6 of the world's human population. That equals , for you people in Rio Linda, FIVE BILLION humans.

So here we have a movement whose goals are far worse than Communism or Nazism - yet it is taught in our school and our pulpits as if it is the sweetest most wonderful thing in the world. By the way this is all built on the phony science of Paul Ehrlich and his population bomb hoax.

Let me give you an example.... the enviros managed to get DDT bannned for almost 40 years based on a book that was a piece of fakery called "Silent Spring". You might say "so what?" Well my friends that decision directly caused the unnecessary death of between 60 and 90 million people in the 3rd world from malaria.

There were three horrible evil movements of the 2oth Century - Naziism, Communism, and the worst of all ENVIRONMENTALISM! And the dupes march on in blissful ignorance....

JimAroo

Oh one more thing - the environmental movement would die without the financial contributions and moral support of Christian churches.... dupes all of them


AMEN, Mr. Aroo!






 About Catholic Exchange  | Donations | Advertise With Us
Contact Catholic Exchange | Our Policies

Copyright © 2006 Catholic Exchange All rights reserved.

Back to Top